Dialogue entre Lord Williams et Bruno Latour, LSE - 23 octobre 2014
Dialogue entre l'ancien archévêque de Canterbury Lord Williams of Oystermouth et Bruno Latour au Faith Centre de la LSE sur le rôle de la religion dans la société à l'heure de la crise environnementale.
Today at LSE BL debates with Lord Williams former archbishop of Canterbury on ecology and theology and the link between creation & nature.
— AIME (@AIMEproject) 24 Octobre 2014
At LSE a diplomatic scene set for scientists, religions and poetry around agency against passivity & ownership argues Lord Williams #LSESSH
— AIME (@AIMEproject) 25 Octobre 2014
The debate with Lord Williams clarifies the notion of apocalypse and its influence on climate denial (from minute 30) http://t.co/B90VdCsdjk
— AIME (@AIMEproject) 1 Novembre 2014
[REL] beings have an objectivity that beats any other mode since it requires to convert those addressed by them hence their apocalyptic tone
— AIME (@AIMEproject) 25 Octobre 2014
Apocalyptic means revelation not Hollywood special effects, no other mode than [REL] is more solidly objective than them in their own terms.
— AIME (@AIMEproject) 25 Octobre 2014
That's why agency captures the actions of [REP] as well as [REF], lends itself so well to storytelling but may also register [REL] vibration
— AIME (@AIMEproject) 25 Octobre 2014
A stunning example of vibrating agency is given by Ian Zalasiewicz The Planet in a Pebble, Ian is the head of the anthropocene committee.
— AIME (@AIMEproject) 25 Octobre 2014
That BL publishes in geoscience journal proves that a diplomatic scene may be set around 'critical zones' see http://t.co/ASz5YAR4Ij
— AIME (@AIMEproject) 25 Octobre 2014
Discussion on [REL] refers to important points made by Phil Conway: of course each mode produces its own sociality http://t.co/P5zUVhvQbt
— AIME (@AIMEproject) 25 Octobre 2014
[REL] detection is not all made in churches: whenever [REL] beings travels they form a specific type of sociality out of religions per se.
— AIME (@AIMEproject) 25 Octobre 2014
If society is not a mode in AIME it's because every mode traces its own connectedness: law, science, fiction, religion generates the social.
— AIME (@AIMEproject) 25 Octobre 2014
Social explanations always miss what's a collective; to explain one peculiar mode of connecting, they bring in a mixture of modes: society.
— AIME (@AIMEproject) 25 Octobre 2014
Ressources externes:
Saw Swee Hock Student Centre Official Opening - Friday 24 October 2014
Philip Conway, "The common ground between secular and religious -- some belated reflections on the religious mode of existence and how it can improve (as)sociology", 8 October 2014, Circling Square. URL : http://circlingsquares.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/the-common-ground-between-secular-and.html