On Graham Harman's Bruno Latour: Reassembling the Political
A few tweets written by Bruno Latour on Graham Harman's new book Bruno Latour: Reassembling the Political (and Graham Harman's answers)
G. Harman's new book Reassembling the Political makes a good start defining the originality of the beings of [POL] and situates AIME in BL's
— AIME (@AIMEproject) 23 Novembre 2014Harman's Reassembling Political allows to read again many older texts of political philosophy from Hobbes to Schmitt & Marres in light of BL
— AIME (@AIMEproject) 23 Novembre 2014Harman's book on [POL] clarifies the difference between Truth & Power politics (in left & right version) with the uncertainty of politics.
— AIME (@AIMEproject) 23 Novembre 2014Harman's Reassembling insists rightly on uncertainty of [POL] but is less clear on the original truth/falsity distinction proper to politics
— AIME (@AIMEproject) 23 Novembre 2014Harman remains obsessed by the quandary between objects out of or in relations which renders hard to register [POL]'s type of transcendence.
— AIME (@AIMEproject) 23 Novembre 2014Conway's critique of Graham's book on [POL] because it renders political philosophy too abstract & outside of context http://t.co/Asm3CuNB44
— AIME (@AIMEproject) 1 Décembre 2014@AIMEproject Very glad that the book will be useful. Would just add that "obsessed" is not a term that fits easily with symmetrical anthrop.
— GrahamHarman (@DrZamalek) 23 Novembre 2014@AIMEproject But the important thing is that BL keeps on going in the same direction. The significance of the AIME project clearer than ever
— GrahamHarman (@DrZamalek) 23 Novembre 2014External Resources:
http://www.plutobooks.com/display.asp?K=9780745333991
http://circlingsquares.blogspot.fr/2014/10/harmans-reassembling-politicalsome.html